Why is it that LL allows 4 packs a day(regardless of height) whereas CD allows only 3 for shorta**ses like me?
I have checked the calories and there is little in it i.e. the difference between four LL packs and 4 CD packs is very little and so adding another CD pack would be neither here nor there - and still allow for excellent weight losses.
The fact that SS+ is an option further confuses me. Why is we are allowed to have 3 packs + a small meal but not an extra pack? I would prefer this - I am not keen to mix packs and food - it can be the thin (unintentional pun) end of the wedge.
I like to stick to SS but it is hard when there are only three packs a day - I have one in the morning (about 7.30p.m.) and then another (about 6.00p.m. after work) and the last around 10.00p.m. (I really look forward to that one).
If I have to miss out one the lunch time one is easiest for me - my days are frenetic and so that's the one I would miss least (even before CD I seldom ate during the working day - except for the 4.00p.m. stress-induced raid on the tea fund biscuit barrell!! ).
It would be nice to be able to have a pack for breakfast, then one for lunch, then one for dinner and the final one for supper. That's how it is on LL.
Anyone know what the rationale is?
Could it be linked to cost? i.e. it allows CD to be even more competitive in the VLCD stakes.
I have checked the calories and there is little in it i.e. the difference between four LL packs and 4 CD packs is very little and so adding another CD pack would be neither here nor there - and still allow for excellent weight losses.
The fact that SS+ is an option further confuses me. Why is we are allowed to have 3 packs + a small meal but not an extra pack? I would prefer this - I am not keen to mix packs and food - it can be the thin (unintentional pun) end of the wedge.
I like to stick to SS but it is hard when there are only three packs a day - I have one in the morning (about 7.30p.m.) and then another (about 6.00p.m. after work) and the last around 10.00p.m. (I really look forward to that one).
If I have to miss out one the lunch time one is easiest for me - my days are frenetic and so that's the one I would miss least (even before CD I seldom ate during the working day - except for the 4.00p.m. stress-induced raid on the tea fund biscuit barrell!! ).
It would be nice to be able to have a pack for breakfast, then one for lunch, then one for dinner and the final one for supper. That's how it is on LL.
Anyone know what the rationale is?
Could it be linked to cost? i.e. it allows CD to be even more competitive in the VLCD stakes.